Anarquisme: diferència entre les revisions

37 bytes afegits ,  fa 8 anys
ref -> ca
(ref -> ca)
(ref -> ca)
Els següents fonts citen l'anarquisme com una filosofia política:
{{cite book | last = Mclaughlin | first = Paul | title = Anarchism and Authority | publisher = Ashgate | location = Aldershot | year = 2007 | isbn = 0-7546-6196-2 |page=59}}
{{cite book | last = Johnston | first = R. | title = The Dictionary of Human Geography | publisher = Blackwell Publishers | location = Cambridge | year = 2000 | isbn = 0-631-20561-6 |page=24}}</ref><ref name=slevin>Slevin, Carl. "Anarchism." ''The Concise Oxford Dictionary of Politics''. Ed. Iain McLean and Alistair McMillan. Oxford University Press, 2003.</ref> Mentre l'anti-estatisme és central, alguns argumenten<ref>"Els anarquistes rebutgen l'Estat, com veurem més endavant. Però afirmar que aquest aspecte central de l'anarquisme és definitiu és vendre curt l'anarquisme."[ ''Anarchism and Authority: A Philosophical Introduction to Classical Anarchism'' by Paul McLaughlin. AshGate. 2007. pg. 28]</ref> que l'anarquisme implica oposar-se a l'[[autoritat]] o l'[[organització jeràrquica]] en la conducció de les relacions humanes, incloent, però no limitat a, el sistema estatal.<ref name="">{{cite web |url= |title=IAF principles |publisher=[[International of Anarchist Federations]] |archiveurl= |archivedate=5 gener 2012 |deadurl=yes |quote=La IAF - IFA lluita per: l'abolició de totes les formes d'autoritat ja sigui econòmica, política, social, religiósa, cultural o sexual.}}</ref><ref>"AuthorityL'autoritat ises defineddefineix inen termstermes ofdel thedret righta toexercir exercise socialel control social (ascom exploreds'analitza inen thela "sociologysociologia ofdel powerpoder") andi theel correlativecorrelatiu dutydeure to obeyd'obeir (ascom exploreds'analitza inen thela "philosophyfilosofia ofde practicalla reasonraó pràctica"). AnarchismL'anarquisme ises distinguisheddistingeix, philosophicallyfilosòficament, byper itsel scepticismseu towardsescepticisme suchcap morala aquest tipus de relacions relationsmorals-bypel itsseu questioningqüestionament ofde theles claimsafirmacions madefetes forper suchaquesta normativepoder powernormatiu- andi, practicallya la pràctica, bypel itsseu challengedesafiament toals thosepoders "authoritativeautoritatius" powersque whichno cannotpoden justifyjustificar theirles claimsseves andafirmacions whichi areque thereforeper deemedtant illegitimatees orconsideren withoutil·legítimes moralo foundationsense fonament moral."[ ''Anarchism and Authority: A Philosophical Introduction to Classical Anarchism'' by Paul McLaughlin. AshGate. 2007. pg. 1]</ref><ref>"Anarchism, then, really stands for the liberation of the human mind from the dominion of religion; the liberation of the human body from the dominion of property; liberation from the shackles and restraint of government. Anarchism stands for a social order based on the free grouping of individuals for the purpose of producing real social wealth; an order that will guarantee to every human being free access to the earth and full enjoyment of the necessities of life, according to individual desires, tastes, and inclinations." [[Emma Goldman]]. "What it Really Stands for Anarchy" in ''[[Anarchism and Other Essays]]''.</ref><ref>Individualist anarchist Benjamin Tucker defined anarchism as opposition to authority as follows "They found that they must turn either to the right or to the left, — follow either the path of Authority or the path of Liberty. Marx went one way; Warren and Proudhon the other. Thus were born State Socialism and Anarchism&nbsp;... Authority, takes many shapes, but, broadly speaking, her enemies divide themselves into three classes: first, those who abhor her both as a means and as an end of progress, opposing her openly, avowedly, sincerely, consistently, universally; second, those who profess to believe in her as a means of progress, but who accept her only so far as they think she will subserve their own selfish interests, denying her and her blessings to the rest of the world; third, those who distrust her as a means of progress, believing in her only as an end to be obtained by first trampling upon, violating, and outraging her. These three phases of opposition to Liberty are met in almost every sphere of thought and human activity. Good representatives of the first are seen in the Catholic Church and the Russian autocracy; of the second, in the Protestant Church and the Manchester school of politics and political economy; of the third, in the atheism of Gambetta and the socialism of Karl Marx." [[Benjamin Tucker]]. [ ''Individual Liberty.'']</ref><ref name="Ward 1966">{{cite web |url=|last=Ward|first=Colin|year=1966|title=Anarchism as a Theory of Organization|accessdate=1 March 2010| archiveurl=| archivedate= 25 March 2010<!--Added by DASHBot-->}}</ref><ref>Anarchist historian [[George Woodcock]] report of [[Mikhail Bakunin]]'s anti-authoritarianism and shows opposition to both state and non-state forms of authority as follows: "All anarchists deny authority; many of them fight against it." (pg. 9)&nbsp;... Bakunin did not convert the League's central committee to his full program, but he did persuade them to accept a remarkably radical recommendation to the Berne Congress of September 1868, demanding economic equality and implicitly attacking authority in both Church and State."</ref><ref>{{cite book |last=Brown |first=L. Susan |chapter=Anarchism as a Political Philosophy of Existential Individualism: Implications for Feminism |title=The Politics of Individualism: Liberalism, Liberal Feminism and Anarchism |publisher=Black Rose Books Ltd. Publishing |year= 2002 |page=106}}</ref>
[1] [9] [10] [11 ] [12] [13] [14]