Usuari:KRLS/TR/no

This is a survey for my Research Project with aim to know the indicators that measure the quality of an article according to the wikipedist community. If you want to answer this survey, just follow the link EDIT, copy and paste the pattern below, paste it in the end and answer the questions. I need tour help! I’m in a hurry so please; answer it as soon as you can.

Attention: Please, do not edit the pattern, just copy and paste in the bottom of the page and answer following the pertinent indications with (<-- -->).

If you have a problem with some questions you can say me your problems in my talk.

TemplateModifica

no:User:Modifica

  • Country:
  • Age:
  • Sex:
  1. You have to fill the following table just with a number from 0 to 10, according to how much you agree with the sentence. 0 means you totally disagree and 10 you totally agree.
Quality indicator Your qualification from 0 to 10
1. The number of articles.
2. The size of a wikipedia article.
3. The number of users.
4. Number of active users.
5. The speed of the vandalisms reversions.
6. Number of edits for article
7. The number of maintenance templates
8. Number of articles with a maintenance templates
9. Number of users that contribute with the wikipedia maintenance
10. References of external sources.
11. Projects specifically dedicated to improve wikipedia's quality.[1]
12. Community contributions to these projects[2]
13. Number of quality articles, good articles...
14. Number of visitors of a wikipedia.[3]
15. Structure of the categories.[4]
16. Redaction and clarity of the articles.
17. Existence of images at wikipedia articles.
18. Are most of your articles at an ordinary encyclopedia?[5]
19. Variety of terms (not included at ordinary encyclopedias).
20. External links to help visitors find more information.
  1. Are there other quality indicators? Which:

AnswersModifica

no:User:SoulkeeperModifica

  • Country: Norway
  • Age: 31
  • Sex: Male
  1. You have to fill the following table just with a number from 0 to 10, according to how much you agree with the sentence. 0 means you totally disagree and 10 you totally agree.
Quality indicator Your qualification from 0 to 10
1. The number of articles. 5
2. The size of a wikipedia article. 7
3. The number of users. 5
4. Number of active users. 7
5. The speed of the vandalisms reversions. 8
6. Number of edits for article 4
7. The number of maintenance templates 4
8. Number of articles with a maintenance templates 3
9. Number of users that contribute with the wikipedia maintenance 6
10. References of external sources. 6
11. Projects to improve it's quality[1] 8
12. Community contributions to this projects[2] 9
13. Number of quality articles, good articles... 7
14. Number of visitors of a wikipedia.[3] 7
15. Structure of the categories.[4] 5
16. Redaction and clarity of the articles. 8
17. Existence of images at wikipedia articles. 6
18. Are most of your articles at an ordinary encyclopedia?[5] 6
19. Variety of terms (not included at ordinary encyclopedias). ?
20. External links to help visitors find more information. 5
  1. Are there other quality indicators? Which:
  • Comment to this survey: The questions are not complete sentences, which makes it easier to misunderstand them. Here are two different ways to interpret question 1: "I believe the number of articles in a language measure the quality of an article.". Or "I believe the number of articles in a category measure the quality of a language." These are two completely different questions. I think that each question in this survey should be phrased as a full sentence, or otherwise clarified. - Soulbot (discussió) 21:47, 24 des 2007 (CET)

no:User:SOAModifica

  • Country:Norway
  • Age:52
  • Sex:M
  1. You have to fill the following table just with a number from 0 to 10, according to how much you agree with the sentence. 0 means you totally disagree and 10 you totally agree.
Quality indicator Your qualification from 0 to 10
1. The number of articles. 10
2. The size of a wikipedia article. 10
3. The number of users. 10
4. Number of active users. 5
5. The speed of the vandalisms reversions. 5
6. Number of edits for article 3
7. The number of maintenance templates 7
8. Number of articles with a maintenance templates 8
9. Number of users that contribute with the wikipedia maintenance 7
10. References of external sources. 10
11. Projects to improve it's quality[1] 10
12. Community contributions to this projects[2] 10
13. Number of quality articles, good articles... 7
14. Number of visitors of a wikipedia.[3] 7
15. Structure of the categories.[4] 10
16. Redaction and clarity of the articles. 10
17. Existence of images at wikipedia articles. 8
18. Are most of your articles at an ordinary encyclopedia?[5] 8
19. Variety of terms (not included at ordinary encyclopedias). 5
20. External links to help visitors find more information. 10
  1. Are there other quality indicators? Which:
  • Reputation
  • Rank as a source for information and scientific research

no:User:Jon Harald SøbyModifica

  • Country: Norway
  • Age: 19
  • Sex: Male
  1. You have to fill the following table just with a number from 0 to 10, according to how much you agree with the sentence. 0 means you totally disagree and 10 you totally agree.


Quality indicator Your qualification from 0 to 10
1. The number of articles. 6
2. The size of a wikipedia article. 7
3. The number of users. 4
4. Number of active users. 4
5. The speed of the vandalisms reversions. 8
6. Number of edits for article 4
7. The number of maintenance templates 5
8. Number of articles with a maintenance templates 6
9. Number of users that contribute with the wikipedia maintenance 7
10. References of external sources. 9
11. Projects to improve it's quality[1] 7
12. Community contributions to this projects[2] 6
13. Number of quality articles, good articles... 8
14. Number of visitors of a wikipedia.[3] 3
15. Structure of the categories.[4] 7
16. Redaction and clarity of the articles. 8
17. Existence of images at wikipedia articles. 7
18. Are most of your articles at an ordinary encyclopedia?[5] 4
19. Variety of terms (not included at ordinary encyclopedias). 9
20. External links to help visitors find more information. 4
  1. Are there other quality indicators? Which:

no:User:AtluxityModifica

  • Country: Norway
  • Age: 22
  • Sex: M
  1. You have to fill the following table just with a number from 0 to 10, according to how much you agree with the sentence. 0 means you totally disagree and 10 you totally agree.
Quality indicator Your qualification from 0 to 10
1. The number of articles. 6
2. The size of a wikipedia article. 7
3. The number of users. 5
4. Number of active users. 7
5. The speed of the vandalisms reversions. 8
6. Number of edits for article 7
7. The number of maintenance templates 3
8. Number of articles with a maintenance templates 4
9. Number of users that contribute with the wikipedia maintenance 6
10. References of external sources. 8
11. Projects to improve it's quality[1] 7
12. Community contributions to this projects[2] 8
13. Number of quality articles, good articles... 10
14. Number of visitors of a wikipedia.[3] 8
15. Structure of the categories.[4] 4
16. Redaction and clarity of the articles. 8
17. Existence of images at wikipedia articles. 8
18. Are most of your articles at an ordinary encyclopedia?[5] 6
19. Variety of terms (not included at ordinary encyclopedias). 7
20. External links to help visitors find more information. 7
  1. Are there other quality indicators? Which:


no:User:GuacaModifica

  • Country: Norway
  • Age: 45
  • Sex: M
  1. You have to fill the following table just with a number from 0 to 10, according to how much you agree with the sentence. 0 means you totally disagree and 10 you totally agree.
Quality indicator Your qualification from 0 to 10
1. The number of articles. 5
2. The size of a wikipedia article. 6
3. The number of users. 8
4. Number of active users. 8
5. The speed of the vandalisms reversions. 7
6. Number of edits for article 7
7. The number of maintenance templates 2
8. Number of articles with a maintenance templates 3
9. Number of users that contribute with the wikipedia maintenance 5
10. References of external sources. 8
11. Projects to improve it's quality[1] Checklist for each new article, to be completed by at least five wikipedians.
12. Community contributions to this projects[2]
13. Number of quality articles, good articles... 9
14. Number of visitors of a wikipedia.[3] 4
15. Structure of the categories.[4] 8
16. Redaction and clarity of the articles. 9
17. Existence of images at wikipedia articles. 6
18. Are most of your articles at an ordinary encyclopedia?[5] 5
19. Variety of terms (not included at ordinary encyclopedias). 6
20. External links to help visitors find more information. 7
  1. Are there other quality indicators? Which:

85.164.38.41 (discussió) 22:55, 26 des 2007 (CET)




CommentsModifica

  1. 1,0 1,1 1,2 1,3 1,4 1,5 A sample could be: List of articles every Wikipedia should have
  2. 2,0 2,1 2,2 2,3 2,4 2,5 Projects referred on point 11.
  3. 3,0 3,1 3,2 3,3 3,4 3,5 This means that people believes in the wikipedia content.
  4. 4,0 4,1 4,2 4,3 4,4 4,5 The order and the way to find articles at their category.
  5. 5,0 5,1 5,2 5,3 5,4 5,5 Ordinary encyclopedias: Enncyclopedia Britannica.